Impact of Previous US Sanctions on Russia Mixed, Experts Say

iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) — The new sanctions ordered by the U.S. government Thursday against Russia in retaliation for alleged election interference may not be as effective as planned, some experts say.

In March of 2014 the United States initially imposed sanctions after Russian troops annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Those measures targeted senior Russian officials and businessmen connected to President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle, as well as a number of key Russian state companies, blocking them from visiting or holding assets in the United States, as well as doing business with some U.S. companies.

According to Paul Saunders, the executive director of the Center for the National Interest, a Washington-based non-partisan foreign policy think tank, these sanctions and falling oil prices have had little — if any — impact on Russia’s behavior or policy decisions.

“If the standard is changing Russian conduct … then I don’t really think the sanctions have accomplished that much,” he said.

Saunders, a former state department political appointee in the George W. Bush administration, added: “The two principle causes of harm to the Russian economy are bad Russian economic policy and low energy prices. It’s really only after we look at those two things then we can talk about the impact of U.S. sanctions.”

Obama broadened the sanctions again after Moscow launched a covert war in eastern Ukraine, where the Kremlin has been arming pro-Russian separatists. The European Union has also imposed its own sanctions against Moscow over the crisis.

On Thursday, the Obama administration expelled 35 Russian intelligence operatives and sanctioned five Russian entities and four individuals for an alleged cyberassault on Democratic political organizations during the 2016 presidential campaign.

“I have ordered a number of actions in response to the Russian government’s aggressive harassment of U.S. officials and cyber-operations aimed at the U.S. election,” Obama wrote in a statement. “These actions follow repeated private and public warnings that we have issued to the Russian government and are a necessary and appropriate response to efforts to harm U.S. interests in violation of established international norms of behavior.”

Putin responded to the latest sanctions in a statement, calling the new sanctions “the recent unfriendly steps taken by the outgoing U.S. administration as provocative and aimed at further weakening the Russia-U.S. relationship.”

John Herbst, the former U.S. ambassador to Uzbekistan who is currently director of the Atlantic Council’s Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center, said the previous sanctions imposed on Russia have largely impacted one person.

“Mr. Putin is a serial aggressor … [and] our sanctions have been successful in imposing a serious cost on Mr. Putin,” he said, citing findings by the International Monetary Fund. “But they have obviously have not done the thing that we wanted them to have done.”

The IMF reported in May that “the Russian economy continues to adjust to the dual shocks of lower oil prices and sanctions.”

Simeon Djankov, the former deputy prime minister and finance minister of Bulgaria, told ABC News that he believes the earlier U.S. sanctions had “perverse” effects in Moscow.

“The only companies that could get access to financing are state-owned companies who have access to state-owned banks,” he said. “Private business, to the extent that it exists, were choked, and state owned business exploded.”

Djankov, who is now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, doesn’t see the latest round of sanctions striking a permanent blow to Russian leaders.

“I don’t think they will be revoked, but I think in three to four months the diplomats will return to their places, but the damage is done,” he said.

He continued, “I think are actually quite appropriate but they’re late because there were signals from other countries particularly in central and eastern Europe that they — Russian agencies and private companies associated with these agencies — have been meddling … in the outcome of elections.”

“By now they have no real effect,” he said.

Copyright © 2016, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print